Skip to content
LPBN-Icon-v1
Human Rights at Home Blog
A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

The Human Rights Obligations of Federal Litigants

By humanrightsathome

A recently published article by Ian M. Kysel, a fellow at Georgetown Law School Human Rights Institute, cogently argues that the federal government’s litigation posture should be informed by its international human rights obligations.  The abstract for the article is below.  The full article is available at 46 Geo. J. Int’l L. 1009 (2015) and on SSRN:

DOMESTICATING HUMAN RIGHTS NORMS IN THE UNITED STATES: CONSIDERING THE ROLE AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AS LITIGANT
 
Abstract
 
There is a large and ever-growing body of scholarship that considers how and whether the United States does or should incorporate international law and standards into domestic law and practice. A significant strain of the commentary and debate focuses on the domestic consequences of U.S international human rights treaty obligations. Remarkably, there has been little distinct consideration of the role of the United States as a litigant in this literature. This Article fills that gap, considering the domestic implications of U.S. international law obligations under both the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the Convention to Eliminate All Forms of Racial Discrimination in the context of federal government enforcement of individual constitutional and civil rights protections. This Article argues both that the United States has distinct obligations and interests in domesticating human rights treaty law–even law that is not formally binding on courts–when it engages in litigation. This Article concludes by recommending a set of actions that could be taken by the executive and legislative branches of the U.S. federal government to clarify and enhance the role of the federal government in advancing compliance with international human rights law when defending U.S. interests in domestic courts.